Showing posts with label wine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wine. Show all posts

20090121

lettre a un oiseàu


nuestro corresponsal en paris nos acerca un espacio de metaforas y paradojas (o quizas ya no son paradojas en el umbral, o tampoco son metaforas).

a veces ni nuestras pisadas sirven al otro dia para entender por donde hemos avanzado.


One day, during the night, I spotted this very beautiful cemetery. It was on placed on a hill and it also had a nice view of the sea. Perfect marriage of mountains and ocean that can be seen from a very different, or maybe not, dichotomy... the place where you have the death... there is this very big something about death. Sometimes I think that the only thing worth to write about is death.
So I was thinking about that when I jumped the fence and got into the empty (?) graveyard, it was a clear night because it was the night after the full-moon and there were also a lot of stars in a very clean sky. I was hoping that there were no guard dogs inside the place. I was looking for ghosts not for big guard dogs. Why was I looking for a ghost? Because of death of course. Because of love and because of traveling. Maybe ghosts know more than me about those things. Maybe they just know what we want them to know. Maybe they are just resonances of energy that are there deforming the layers of reality. Anyway, I was bored and I felt like walking in the graveyard. Not so surprisingly, I did not find any ghosts around the place, so I decided to continue my reflexions alone.
Then a shadow with the shape of a girl appears beneath the long shadows of the trees and says, without saying anything, “it is about death, but it is also about love and about traveling”. I look back at it suspiciously, and I think to myself: is this shadow of something-that-is-not-there really talking to me? Or is it just my vivid imagination? Or maybe just too many drugs or too much drinking?... or just magic, let’s invite magic to this special dinner in the moonlight. I sit down , and stare at the sky looking like wondering but not wondering at all, then I reply “is just about death”... the shadow move a little bit, like trying to hide a restless feeling, and says “what about love? What about traveling?” I smiled to the end of all cowards and start drawing something on the floor with my foot, maybe just to check if this was real at all, and knowing of the traitorous and hideous form that was my company, I said “love and traveling are only important cuz they are the things that can show you the shadow of death, by loosing, and loosing big, they show you something about death” what I don’t want to say is that by speaking about death you are only speaking about life, because let’s be honest, little we know about death.

One day, during the afternoon, I felt like something else. Not something that sits and reads “kafka in the shore”, I felt more like a bear. Not a particularly big bear, but a bear nevertheless. One that lives in the forest...
Maybe not a bear, something smaller, like a pixie! That’s it, a forest pixie. So i needed to be in the woods, perhaps to climb a tree, perhaps a to sleep, perhaps to dream like the english poet would say. I walked then, towards the trees, magnificent Eucalyptus, so far from your homeland you are! And jet you look so in place, so beautiful! Lets walk further, I bet there is some secret passage somewhere in here... I can smell it.
Then, there is some change, like if all the colors together have chose to change just a little bit of their tonalities. I knew there was a passage in here! I close my eyes, I feel the breeze, the gentle touch of the air, the sea air, a purifying kind of air. Perhaps is the years of just “being there” carried out by these molecules colliding in my body... the sea air. I look for a place now, a spot, I know is here I just need to pay attention. After walking for a while I find it, and is nice, at least nice. I lay down and close my eyes, then I start hearing the woods, the certain wind is now moving the trees and as they dance they also sing, they sing about the greenness, they sing about some big spirit, the noises of the woods are the voice of this spirit, and it is now singing, and as it sings I slowly drift to sleep. My dreams are colorful and warm, at some point too warm, I start to feel translated to some other language, like if I am suddenly move from one domain to another, my legs are too warm, they feel like burning... I wake up, my body is half protected by shadows and half exposed to a unmerciful sun, of course my legs are burning. I stand up, I said good bye and I came back.


To write with green is not a detail if you always do it with green.
Just like the thresholds or the liminal states
Just like there are goings and comings
An then of course, thresholds appear
Perhaps the seasoned free-thinker, always present among the lambs, might reply to us “And what thing it a going or a coming if not just an infinite succession of thresholds?”
Very clever sir! Very clever indeed!
But tell me sir: do you know the difference between to feel oneself wet as the imperturbable and sometimes cold rocks of a garden in an april morning, and to feel wet as an ancient and proud ship which is resting its glory, caress by the waves, in some lost harbor?
It is so certain that you know this difference as it is also certain that you cannot pose it. Mainly because you believe that the symbolisms of the sphinx are an artifice.

Let us tolerate that there are thresholds of many durations, which is just the same as many sizes. But there are also goings and there are also comings, and those are different from thresholds mainly because of the blood.

And what if this time we travel hanging from other’s words?
But what is “other’s words”?
It does not matter.

And what happens with words in the goings?
And what happens with words in the comings?
But even more important, if you allow me this digression, it is what happens with words in the thresholds.
Let us say for example:
Carlos felt strangely nostalgic, a disturbance, similar in subtleness and reach as the one that could be felt in front of a change of light, when suddenly this strange nostalgic feeling started to move in the woods of his internal forum not as a nostalgic feeling anymore but as a feeling of missing, but not any kind of missing, but as the missing of a leg that he did not ever have.

Why can’t Carlos describe in a less complicated way that unexpected but certain sensation?

Because in thresholds words hide themselves.
No!
They do not hide, they disappear. But they disappear in a way that little has to do with not being there anymore. Is more like if they were tools that for some strange reason, and from one moment to another, cannot be used anymore. Is not that the tools are broken, or that our hands are not made for using them. Is that when we are going to use them something happens between the tools and our hands that ends up as the most clumsy and catastrophic of the dances. An spectacle that, although could seem to be funny, lacks any amount of grace.
And there is Carlos,
in the threshold,
with his disappeared, or transfigured into functional but impossible tools, words.
However, in the same way that to light a lantern in the middle of the night can congregate a myriad of insects, thresholds can congregate symbols. Symbols which, just as in the case of insects, is not like they were not there before, but they become evident now. But be careful! In contrast with bugs, symbols can leave you more than a rash.

Let us go back to Carlos, the threshold and the unexpected jet as clear as ambiguous symbols.
The words are not.
The symbols are.

Can Carlos make use of the symbols, just as he used to with the previously useful words, to communicate his experience in the threshold?
Of course not.
Of course yes.

You tell me...


H

20081128

al mediodia el ron con limon sabe mejor


llamame para inventar caprichos.

con tu sudor.

llamame como quieras.

cerdo. dios. juez. autoridad. patan. embustero.

con un machete en la mano, llevalo leve.

en el pecho una pistola. no necesito pasaporte.

con ustedes, la plastilina mosh.

all you need is mosh.

20080629

Voy a tratar de contar la historia como la recuerdo ayer

El viernes ultimo tuvimos una conversacion con alumnos del departamento de fisica de la universidad de chile en la cual la tostaduria presento e intento dar un sentido a algunos hechos cientifificos acontecidos el ultimo tiempo.

Empezamos mostrando el siguiente video: como entiende el mundo una maquina.

Pero este es un texto sobre ciencia, asi q a ello.

Cuales son las preguntas fundamentales de la ciencia? Segun Science las dos primeras son
Cuales son las bases biologicas de la conciencia? y
De que esta hecho el universo?

Pero al revisar estas grandes preguntas nos nace inmediatamente una tercera: Como vamos a responder estas preguntas en un tiempo razonable? Esta pregunta no aparecia en la lista de Science, pero creemos que es el momento de agregarla.

Durante años la imagen del cientifico es alguien que ha podido levantarse sobre un pequeño banco y ha mirado a su alrrededor de forma fria e impracial, con lo cual establece hipotesis, modelos y comprueba o rechaza las hipotesis. Gracias a ellos, hemos logrado cosas increibles para la humanidad. Y les damos las gracias.


Pero creemos que algo paso en el camino, y hoy en dia cuando intentamos responder la gran pregunta de la conciencia decimos que algo esta demostrado con un estudio que abarca 18 sujetos. Lo que al verlo con ojos criticos nos parece solo modulacion de ruido blanco, pareidolia.

Estudiamos los ruiseñores en el artico en vez de hacer algo por el calentamiento global. Llevamos una maquina a marte y no nos preocupamos de que lleve caspa. Y nos sentimos orgullosos.

Hay genocidios en africa y carceles en irak que nos dicen que la humanidad no tiene futuro, y la estatua, con su cielo limpio de conceptos no da cuenta de esto. Sobre hombros de gigantes el cientifico mira hacia adelante, contestando sus preguntas con corazon de piedra.


Y entendemos que es importante la ciencia, pero tambien entendemos que existen muchas otras cosas importantes. Entonces como podemos evaluar si es necesario que les entregemos billones de dolares para construir juguetes si no son capaces de justificar estas inversiones mas que diciendo “el metodo funciona asi que continuamos” ?. Ejemplos hay muchos, el ITER es uno de los mas visibles.

Y nos da rabia, nos da pena, que este cientifico este quemando los recursos de la humanidad para contestar sus preguntas, para jugar su juego.

Son mis impuestos, es mi conocimiento. Creemos que el ciudadano a pie se va a dar cuenta de esto. Y va a decir basta! Es mi dinero, quiero que se invierta bien. De la misma manera que quiero que mis carreteras no tengan hoyos, quiero que la investigacion cientifica sea seria. Entonces es necesario que los cientificos se preparen y comienzen a justificar el porque estan haciendo lo que hacen. Si es solo su curiosidad, mis impuestos no son para eso.

Y Queremos que ese conocimiento que nuestros impuestos financian sea libre. Porque el conocimiento es real. Y la realidad se hizo densa por medio de los datos: Linux, google, wiki y el iphone son hechos que no podremos olvidar nunca.

Y los datos, la masa de datos de cualquier tipo que tenemos a nuestra dispocicion. Para hacerles todas las preguntas que queramos, pero de forma simple y natural.

Pero estos datos no nos dicen nada sin un cuento detras. Sin un relato que contextualice y les de sentido, en el sentido mas amplio de la palabra sentido.



Entonces, cuando wired dice que la ciencia se acabo, creemos que tiene algo de razon. Hay cosas que no podemos seguir permitiendole a nuestra estatua. Creemos que como a la estatua del principe feliz le faltan partes: contexto, humanidad, sentido, honestidad e inocencia.

Aca es donde la tercera pregunta vuelve y se hace evidente su necesidad. Como respondemos nuestras preguntas en un tiempo razonable?

Que las maquinas hagan lo que saben hacer, y que los cientificos escriban cuentos.

Creemos que es tiempo de dividir a la ciencia. El cientifico, en su humanidad, al presentarse con una hipotesis ante la realidad va a modificar los datos que obtenga.

Proponemos el desarrollo de 3 capas de ciencia.1) La adquicicion de datos, donde la inocencia ante ellos debe ser absoluta, por lo cual no los puede tomar alguien con hipotesis hechas sobre los datos. 2) La capa de analisis, donde computadores se encargan de filtrar la informacion y presentar las correlaciones. Por ejemplo, que las casas de color rojo generan mas viento que las de otros colores. 3) La capa de interpretacion o sentido, este es el lugar donde los cientificos hacen sus preguntas e interpretan las respuestas, explicandonos como es que las casas rojas producen viento.


Entonces, a nivel general como funciona el asunto? Se miden cosas que interesen a la sociedad en su conjunto, por ejemplo, miles de eeg de personas haciendo alguna tarea en particular. Y esto debe ser concordado y perfeccionado, necesitamos gente calificada que obtenga datos de manera professional y deben ser financiados de la misma manera que son ahora las clasicas investigaciones. Y las publicaciones deben hacerse responsables de fomentar la medicion y fomentar y patrocinar estandares.

Los datos se ingresan de manera ciega a un servidor que los almacena, ordena y prepara para analizar. Como estos datos son hechos de la naturaleza, pertenecen al dominio publico y se debe garantizar el acceso a ellos de cualquier persona o entidad. Pero no nos referimos a medicion bruta, son humanos los que se preocupan de medir, ciantificos en su forma tanto como cualquiera, preocupados de evolucionar la captacion de datos. El cientifico obtiene los resultados sin alterar los datos ni modificarlos para que cumplan sus expectativas

En base a lo anterior, proponemos revisar y adecuar el metodo cientifico y lo vemos de esta forma:
1. Define the question
2. Ask data (observe)
3. Form hypothesis
4. If the data exist, send the query. If there is no data, ask for it to the UNIT that perform experiment and collect data
5. Interpret the answer to the query and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis
6. Publish results
7. Retest (do again 4 if there is new data on the system)

Y para finalizar, queremos agradecer a Kim por hacernos ver el sentido a nosotros tambien.


La Tostaduria

20080609

!!! viene a Chile



Y lo trae la tostaduria.

Como parte de su primera gira por southamerica, como dicen en family guy, !!! vino a chile este verano 2009.

Aca extractos de las primeras conversaciones con la banda, por alla por junio:

Hey,
Never had an offer for Chile, but I would LOVE to do it. We're talking about doing some dates in Mexico this Dec, and I'd like to parlay that into a South American jaunt (Brazil, Argentina, Chile). We'll see what happens.
Thanks for writing.
Mario

On Jun 7, 2008, at 11:35 PMPDT, Sebastian Gonzalez wrote:

Hi tap tap tap,

I just found this video of you in le trabendo last november (I was there) and was asking when are you coming to Chile, or some place in south america.


If you want to come, La tostaduria ( http://latostaduria.blogspot.com ) invites the pot and the wine.

Best,
Sebastian

20080514

voces del espectro


tema: aphex twin - ΔMi−1 = −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C{i}Fji[n − 1] + Fexti[n−1]]
segmento: 5:27 - 5:42
analisis: frecuencias sobre canal derecho en escala logaritmica

20080419

dttu



Editores de la Tostaduria son invitados a cubrir evento musical en chile.

gracias a NNM